Also, notice that Siri was under grave and unjust durress from the freemasons who apparantly infiltrated the Vatican. he was too weak to speak in the Council(maybe he was poisoned?) and that, if they really did kill him, nobody would know what happened in the 1958 conclave, and the Church really would come to an eend. This is, supposing that the Siri thesis really did happen.
There is a refutation on that John Vennari’s attack on the alleged Papacy of Gregory XVII. It shows just how Siri never really did celebrate a, strictly speaking Novus ordo Mass, how he was under no autorithy of the seemingly anti-popes, and all that. This of course, if ever the Siri thesis really did happen.
As for Siri signing the council degrees, yes, he did sign them, but Siri, in a fit of love for Mary Immaculate said: we will not be bound by these decrees. Notice that he used we, which really could show that Siri wanted you to know that he is the Pope.
What people usually omit from the forums is the mentioning of that rather holy Priest Fr. Peter Khoat Van Tran. I am in no way trying to confirm that I believe in the Siri Thesis, so as to not get my account locked, but, would it not be a bit rash to not study the Siri thesis, and to reject it just because it does not go according to one’s liking?