Am I the only one here who thinks Barbarian can’t have a reasoned discussion with those who don’t agree with him. You present links to articles, information, and data which refutes, or at the very least calls into question, AGW.
As you see, the data doesn’t agree with the guys you linked to. In fact, they didn’t present data sets, they just cherry picked the parts they thought might support their postions.
He presents the same graphs over and over and then cops the " you’ve been lied to" bit, which is getting old.
Facts are facts. They won’t go away. Gettting frustrated and attacking me won’t help. You need to find some facts to counter the ones already on the table.
Someone who does not even want to look at all angles of an issue is someone I simply can’t trust.
And it appears you can’t trust yourself. You’ve simply decided to believe something, in spite of the data. And that’s a problem.
Telling me I’m frustrated because I posted something he didn’t want to know about his hero Hansen, I consider the last straw.
Too bad. Even if Hansen was a bad guy, it doesn’t change the data set. That kind of tactic is pretty much the last effort of people who don’t have anything going for their argument.
Which brings us to your abandonment of argument in favor of a personal attack on me. It’s a very telling admission on your part. And your increasingly strident complaints that I think Hansen is “perfect” or that he’s my “hero” pretty much nails that.
Am I frustrated? Yes, but it’s not for the reasons he thinks.
I think everyone who’s been watching the discussion knows why you’re frustrated, even if you won’t admit it.