Religious education is not brainwashing

Thinking children can make choices about religion without moral guidance is simply naive

Is religious education a form of brainwashing? Should children be free to make their own decisions about fundamental matters of faith? These questions are provoked by the new poster sponsored by the British Humanist Association. Two gloriously happy children hold their hands in the air as if they are about to do a cartwheel. The main text reads: “Please don’t label me. Let me grow up and choose for myself.” And floating in the background are the various labels under attack: “Buddhist child. Agnostic child. Protestant child. Humanist child. Catholic child. Atheist child…” The call to liberate children is superficially appealing but fundamentally naïve. Here are four reasons why:

First: The exercise of freedom requires some prior foundation. Children have to learn how to make choices: how to weigh things up, how to judge what is best, how to take responsibility. Any child psychologist knows this. Freedom doesn’t just happen. And an essential part of learning to choose is having some sense of the meaning of the world we inhabit, of the value of our actions, and of the significance of their consequences. In other words, freedom can’t be learnt outside a context of meaning and values.

Religious faith can help establish this context; so can a robust humanism. But to think that freedom can be learnt in a vacuum, without the sharing of any moral or philosophical convictions, is simply naïve. Children who are brought up without inherited values of any kind are actually less able to exercise their freedom and choose for themselves. Just as children who are brought up without boundaries will never be able to learn the significance of crossing them.

Second: If you believe something important to be true, then you shouldn’t pretend it is an open question. This goes for secular humanists as much as for religious believers. If, for example, you are a convinced atheist, and you think that belief in God is false at an intellectual level and damaging through its distorting effects on morality, then of course you would want to share this conviction with your children. It would be unjust to keep it from them. Similarly, if you believe in God, and you believe that this faith is not just a lifestyle choice or a cultural imperative but an objective truth with profound implications for human existence, how could you not share this conviction with your children? Yes, you want to nurture their freedom and you hope they will discover things for themselves. But if it is a question of truth – whether scientific or moral or spiritual – then you will inevitably want to guide your children along a certain path, knowing full well that they may one day choose to veer off in another direction.

Read more:

The religion of Humanism/Secularism/Materialism is forced on our children every minute of the day. Give me a break.:rolleyes: And yes these are religions and always have been. satan has just done a good job camouflaging them.

Those two kids are actually Christians. I guess they couldn’t find any happy little atheist. Which just goes to show that atheist are sad lonely little people who raise depressed mentaly repressed kids.

Catholics baptize infants, for we understand fully that we are the ones who are making the first choices for our young ones.

It is impossible not to socialize children into believing in something. Humanist seem to feel that theirs would be the default position, that if we fail to teach children then they would be simply humanist who will later make decisions.

This not just pure silliness. This is beyond inane even.
No words can describe such vacuous thinking.

Yet this passes for wisdom for many of our intellectual elites.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit