Roger Stone jury foreperson's anti-Trump social media posts surface after she defends DOJ prosecutors

Not got me personally, but I believe in due process and the presumption of innocence for everyone, even the judge whose impartiality has been called into question.

https://a.msn.com/r/2/BB100Yoc?m=en-us&ocid=News

Roger Stone asks for new trial in sealed motion, one day after Trump accused jury forewoman of bias

Defense attorneys for Roger Stone demanded a new trial Friday, one day after President Trump suggested that the forewoman in his friend’s case had “significant bias.” The legal motion could delay Stone’s Feb. 20 sentencing date on charges of witness tampering and lying to Congress.
The basis for the request and supporting records were filed under seal Friday, the filing’s existence was disclosed in a court order by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson that gave U.S. prosecutors until Tuesday to respond.
Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post
“Now it looks like the fore person in the jury, in the Roger Stone case, had significant bias,” Trump wrote on Twitter on Thursday, in a week in which his public comments have set off a crisis of confidence in the Justice Department. “Add that to everything else, and this is not looking good for the ‘Justice’ Department.”

McConnell and Graham knew what the Democrat evidence was long before it was presented to the Senate. If they could watch TV, it was all there to see.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.