Alright, so here is the presented scenario.
‘A large crisis breaks out (let’s just a zombie crisis), and about 95% of the world population is wiped out. You are on the move, and going into abandoned stores.
In these stores, you take what you need, and move on to the next, taking what you need also, and grabbing some stuff for the future.
Now, with each store, you are either confident that, or 100% sure that the owner is either dead or never coming back to this place.’
Would this be morally acceptable if you are either confident that, or 100% sure that the owner is either dead or never coming back to the place?
(Note: I’m just curious because I’ve been watching the Walking Dead, and they scavenge stores where the owner is usually found dead, or where there isn’t a person in sight. Just curious!)