Single Moms and NAMBLA

With a lot of smiles and an occasional out loud laugh, I read Ann Coulter’s latest book “Guilty.” Once again with her no-holds barred writing style she takes on some of America’s most sacred cows. You want controversy? How about a chapter title, “Victim of a Crime? Thank a Single Mother.” As only Ann can do, she backs up her allegations with numerous, hard-to-refute statistics. Even considering Sir Winston Churchill’s quote, “Statistics are like a drunk with a lamppost: used more for support than illumination,” Ann’s argument is compelling.

I’m not a sociologist, a criminologist, or any other type of “ologist,” but I bring to the table twenty-six years of street experience as a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. During my career, I worked organized crime, gangs, terrorism, and child exploitation. I’ve seen society at its best and its worst, and I often viewed it from the inside. Many of my twenty-six years were spent undercover. I have successfully posed as a contract killer, drug dealer, fence, international arms dealer, degenerate gambler, and white collar criminal. But it was my last assignment, playing the role of a pedophile, that opened my eyes to a societal problem going beyond what Ann discusses in her book.

I spent three years infilitrating the North American Man/Boy Love Association. NAMBLA is real and not just some episodic joke on South Park or The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. NAMBLA is an underground network of men who are sexually attracted to boys and seek to justify their attraction.

On December 2, 1978, in response to what some activists claim to have been a witch hunt of twenty-four men arrested for child pornography and the statutory rape of boys, a meeting was held at the Community Church in Boston. About thirty men mobilized that evening and formed NAMBLA.

The express purpose of this organization is to abolish age-of-consent laws and legalize consensual sex between men and boys. In reality, this group, hiding behind the First Amendment, uses the secret meetings as a networking opportunity to reinforce among themselves their criminal passions. I know because I was invited into the inner sanctum. I attended meetings, participated in their pen pal program, wrote for their magazine, and was asked twice to serve on the steering committee, their governing body. Not once during my three-year membership was there any effort to lobby any political figure at any level of government to seek to abolish or even to modify the age-of-consent laws. There was no talk of hiring a paid lobbyist in Washington; there was no organized letter writing campaign; there was no endorsement of candidates. For all intents and purposes these men meet to network with other child molesters on where and how to find and seduce boys. We proved that when an FBI-orchestrated sting operation netted eight members of what one defendant called the group’s “inner circle.”

bighollywood.breitbart.com/bhamer/2009/02/17/single-moms-and-nambla-by-bob-hamer/

At the moment NAMBLA seems to be just an organization to help predators learn to seduce boys.

I don’t doubt though, that once gay marriage is legal, they will push in earnest for a reduction in the age of consent to age 12, arguing that these boys should have equal rights to marry.

I don’t doubt it either. It only took 5 years for that to happen in the Netherlands with the legalization of the PVD party. :frowning: :frowning: :frowning: :frowning:

Anyways, pedophilia with adolescent boys is much more difficult to combat than with adolescent girls. If you read about Zeus and The Rape of Ganymede painting where male desire for adolescent boys was often expressed in ancient cultures, such as Ancient Greece. They ask a question: Can you rape the willing? Boys are often much more willing to experiment than girls.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganymede_(mythology
gay-art-history.org/gay-history/gay-literature/gay-mythology-folktales/homosexual-greek-mythology/zeus-ganymede-gay/zeus-ganymede-gay.html
imdb.com/title/tt0379952/

I would not be surprised if teen boys who have desires for older men became some of the most vocal and loudest defenders for lowering the age of consent, making it harder for other people who care about their lives and their health to protect them as well as those in their family! :frowning: :frowning: :mad:

If you look at how certain sites focusing on male love depict things such as the Rape of Ganymede. The call it male love. Do we know the difference between sacramental, holy and pure love and morally horrible, lust, that is an ** abomination to God?** :rolleyes:

You see Brokeback Mountain extolled. Will we soon be praising Lolita? Some people actually take the side of Nabokov when reading the book Lolita!!!

This is stuff from the early '90’s in my life story. I hung out with a lot of queer-pride extremists, most young and powerless but the literature on the magazine racks I frequented and around the coffeeshops and public stalls made it clear that there was a real drive to eliminate all laws relating to sex except those against violent rape. People argued about the meaning of childhood sexuality, using themselves as examples and claiming to have been very willing at ages like eleven and nine and even three. I argued against pedophilia of course, and everyone thought I was a real prude even though I was outrageous compared to almost anyone mainstream at the time. I held what they thought of as the very prudish position that children become ready for sex at different times but basically sometime in high school. They certainly did want to eliminate marriage, except as something fun to play at. Yet they used the example of “primitive people who marry twelve year old girls when they’re 24” as the mainstay of the argument to get rid of all ages of consent. They thought the more different deviancies a person had experimented with, the wiser, cooler and more likable the person was. From that viewpoint, they saw “introducing” a younger person to sexual variations as a part of education. I wasted plenty of time arguing about this until I realized they knew I was right and didn’t care. The few, whoever they were, who had worked that concept into the scene were trying to legitimize their obsessions and deeply motivated to ignore all contrary opinions, and the many who just wanted to fit in were so lonely they would repeat whatever the majority at a party, coffeeshop or club said.
With that flashback in mind, I’ll suggest the testimonies of victims of NAMBLA’s movement be kept in the public eye as a counterattack in case they start trying to promote their desires through children’s testimonies.

And what is the vote for the PVD party?

Dutch legalized the NVD political party in 2006. As far as I know, only 3 or 4 people are public members but 2006 is 3 years ago. More could have joined since then and more still could support in secret. In much of the Middle East and Africa, child wives as young as 12 are commonly accepted so who knows how societal mores will change in the future. :o :confused: :shrug:

Outcry Over Launch of Dutch Pedophile Party
smh.com.au/news/world/outcry-over-launch-of-dutch-pedophile-party/2006/05/31/1148956392681.html

Dutch pedophiles are launching a political party to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 and the legalisation of child pornography and sex with animals, sparking widespread outrage.

The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party said on its website it would be officially registered today, proclaiming: “We are going to shake The Hauge awake!”

The party said it wanted to cut the legal age for sexual relations to 12 and eventually scrap the limit altogether.

“A ban just makes children curious,” Ad van der Berg, one of the party’s founders, told the ALgemeen Dagblad newspaper.

“We want to get into parliament so we have a voice. Ohter politicians only talk about us in a negative sense, as if we were criminals,” Van den Berg told Reuters.

The Netherlands, which already has liberal policies on soft drugs, prostitution and gay marriage, was shocked by the plan.

An opinion poll published today showed that 82 percent wanted the government to do something to stop the new party, while 67
per cent said promoting pedophilia should be illegal.

“They make out as if they want more rights for children. But their position that children should be allowed sexual contact
from age 12 is of course just in their own interest,” anti-pedophile campaigner Ireen van Engelen told the AD daily.

Well, as they used to say in Germany in the bad old days, Schiessen Sie allen, und nehmen Sie keine Genfangenen.

I believe that their motto is "eight is too late"I am in favour of disarming ALL rapists.

I’m in favour of removing more than their arms but I don’t believe it is polite to speak any further on that.

Yet another reason why protecting the family is important.

Oh, but even NAMBLA and others will agree with that, arguing that a family is any group of loving individuals.

:smiley:

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.