…So tell me again why I should be greatful for existing?
Perhaps I was happier as a cloud of quirks and strings. :shrug:
Simply out of the desire of a superior being I come from neutral comfortable nothingness “to be”, only to be confronted with some realities, that I am “being” forever, that if I don’t conform and show appreciation I will be made uncomfortable forever. There is never a condition where one can oppose, worse, that every disagreement is a measure of unappreciation, and that everything is taken personally and that a state of paranoia is the norm in this environment. I discover that mistrust of me is OK, but I cannot mistrust my creator, and that I am to make that grand leap and accept him has my Father.
I discover that stigmatization doesn’t prevent the creator from creating more of us. One of my first questions is why beings are created when the first act the creator will do is a negative one against him, but I catch myself increasingly becoming aware of what “self preservation” is. Based simply on what I am learning, this environement is a dangerous one. I am tempted to suggest as a more satisfying experiment a re-design and chock this up has a bad one, at least he wouldn’t need to go to the trouble of stigmatizing them on creation. I wonder if he’s trying to make this mistake work at the being’s expense.
Continuing my objective study of my new environment, I discover spiritual class beings who in a better position to realize the result of the actions and offend the creator, fair better when sentenced. I discover that I am to strive for perfection when save for 2 people out 2± trillion (and still counting) who were deliberately made that way, have never attained it. Those odds are supposed to instill hope and inspire me. I discover my kind is already stigmatized, showing me I enter in the midst of a battle ground and environment of opposing forces and an aire of hostility, definitely not the peace of non-existance.
The superior being claims the right to cause aware beings to be, that he can reach in that pool of nothingness parts box and make us. Since no judicial system exists, it is just as invalid as valid that that claim is justified. The very fact that he can “claim” supposes a pre-existing justice or code to abide by, when there is none. All created beings can claim on that same precept or lack thereof, that they have a right not to exist. The rights should come from a precept that ALL being abide by.
So I think these are the key points. Of course I find life interesting but I wonder about the value of it. It seems it should have value outside of the what is right and wrong. I think there are issues that are unjust based on things that have nothing to do with de/merit. As I already mentioned, spiritual beings should not be favored over material beings if they prove they can offend just as the material can. Most importantly for the sake of appearance, (if anyone really cared), added culpability should exist because of their favored position, not the reverse.
Another is black box justice. There is never any consideration how we may feel about having justice hidden from us, never any consideration of anxiety it may cause. Why not have the result of celestial trials revealed to us.? If we would discover just what was told to us, what harm would it do to reveal it.? What is it to bend to triviality just once, as a true “Father” would for his children.
He makes that claim remember, yet another claim?
MMMmmm, non existance seems like the better option.