I’m pretty sure these arguments fail to make the grade, but, for my peace of mind, I’d appreciate if you guys would help me here.
Specifically, the supposed fallible problems of Liberius, Vigilius and Honorius.
(I’m not really worried about the Hans Kung problem, I read something on that once before and came out totally convicned it wasn’t a problem.)
I looked at them more closely, and they seem not to make the grade, but I’d appreciate explanations from you guys (i.e., for not condemning something, which doesn’t equal to support).
Oh and, sorry for bringing up the same, old, tired arguments.