Can anyone help me know the truth about what really happened in the Spanish Inquisition. I am told different things, and I don’t know what is real, or fabricated.
Henry Kamen’s The Spanish Inquisition is a great place to start. Kamen is an atheist so his credibility cannot be questioned. No one would accuse him of being a Catholic syncophant.
Kamen totally dismantles all of the non-Catholic claims and myths concerning the Inquisition. What you’ve already been given links to is all corroborated by Kamen and other modern historians. The BBC even did a program a few years ago that also shot down all of the nonsense perpetrated in the past.
Thanks. Guess i didn’t really need to start a thread. i should have just taken what you’d given. i just thought it would be helpful for others to be able to debate the point with both protestants and athiests.
we shall see what happens.
Oh good, I get to link to my article on
(from July 1998, 10 year anniversary )
A dubious proposition!
No one would accuse him of being a Catholic syncophant.
True, but a Protestant might accuse him of having a revisionist agenda. One could make a case that a secular revisionist writing in English might have a bias against the traditional Whig Protestant narrative of Western history.
Don’t get me wrong–I second your recommendation of Kamen enthusiastically. But the argument “so-and-so has such-and-such a religious/nonreligious stance and thus can’t be accused of bias” is a flawed one.
No historian is beyond question. No historian is beyond bias, and bias can take very funny forms. It’s simply not a good idea to appeal to some supposed lack of bias. It’s much better to appeal to professional credentials, and to cite several different historians when possible.