Listen, man is an animal too. If a man kills a man it is not murder. It’s nature. Giving rise to your logic. O but man is not an animal. Yes, he is. If a man kills a beast. It is not murder. It is nature. Woah! That blows my head wide open! If a man kills a man it is called murder. If a man kills an animal then it is called nature. But man is an animal. No. he’s not.
Are you okay? You seem to be posting contradictory material in your responses. Are you trying to anticipate our answers or something? I would suggest not doing that. Anyways, what separates man from other animals, and this should be clear to skeptics as much as it is to believers, is humans possess intelligence and understand what they are doing. Animals, on the other hand, don’t really comprehend what they are doing. They just do it out of instinct. That’s a big difference and I don’t think you’ve recognized it.
Man is made out of flesh. Animals are made out of flesh. So…man has a soul. Animals don’t have souls? Why? Man and animal share flesh. Are you telling me that they don’t share souls? THEY JUST DON’T! O ok. I’m just not buying it guys.
Actually, animals do have souls but they cease to exist after the animal dies. Maybe at the Resurrection, God will restore them. Maybe He won’t. You seem to fail to realize the big difference between humans and animals.
Actually, man does still live in the garden of Eden. Don’t you remember. We bombed it recently.
Getting into politics, are we? Let’s take this one step at a time. Anyways, Scripture only tells us that the Garden of Eden was located in that area; that does not mean it still exists. You have to learn to understand those kinds of differences if you are effectively debate this kind of stuff. How old are you, if you don’t me asking?
Yes, we do know where Eden was. It says so right in the bible. The rivers and that thing.
That thing? Uh…okay.
Listen, if something cannot be interpretted literally then it becomes a fable and guess work.
I see you fancy yourself an authority, so tell us why that is so? Tell us why a non-literal story can’t contain morals and important messages for people?
Yea, I know that we come from one common ancestor; but homo sapien has been around for over 200,000 years.
So there is scientific evidence for an Eve but since it doesn’t fit with your world view, you reject it?
The garden of Eden did not exist.
I thought you just said it still existed? Of course, I knew what you really meant but you’re not being honest and straight forward about it. By your own logic, you can’t be trusted.
There is no way that that text could have been passed down that long of a period.
Please tell us why this is so.
If your going to take facts into account then you must take all the facts into account.
Of course, but you’ll still need to explain why it is so.