The Obama Justice Department went to bat for the New Black Panther party—and then covered it up

The case is straightforward. On Election Day 2008, two members of the New Black Panther party (NBPP) dressed in military garb were captured on videotape at a Philadelphia polling place spouting racial epithets and menacing voters. One, Minister King Samir Shabazz, wielded a nightstick. It was a textbook case of voter intimidation and clearly covered under the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

A Department of Justice trial team was assigned to investigate. They gathered affidavits from witnesses—one of the poll watchers was called a “white devil” and a “cracker.” A Panther told him he would be “ruled by the black man.” The trial team, all career Justice attorneys and headed by voting section chief Chris Coates, filed a case against the two Panthers caught on tape. Malik Zulu Shabazz, head of the national NBPP, and the party itself were also named based on evidence the party had planned the deployment of 300 members on Election Day and on statements after the incident in which the NBPP endorsed the intimidation at the Philadelphia polling station.

The trial team quickly obtained a default judgment—meaning it had won the case because the New Black Panther party failed to defend itself. Yet in May 2009, Obama Justice Department lawyers, appointed temporarily to fill top positions in the civil rights division, ordered the case against the NBPP dismissed. An administration that has pledged itself to stepping-up civil rights enforcement dropped the case and, for over a year, has prevented the trial team lawyers from telling their story.

...

With Adams’s resignation and letter, a clearer picture is finally emerging of what led to the dismissal of the case, the actions of DoJ political appointees, the department’s misrepresentations about the case, and the Obama administration’s approach to civil rights enforcement.

weeklystandard.com/articles/friends-high-places

Wouldn't a white President, whose appointees did the same for a group of militant clansmen (KKK) be considered a racist?

i wonder why more is not said about this in the media? :confused:

[quote="7_Sorrows, post:3, topic:201746"]
i wonder why more is not said about this in the media? :confused:

[/quote]

I assume that's merely a rhetorical wondering?

A leftist Chicago community organizer doesn't mind leftist gangsterism? Whodathunkit?

Anyway, obviously both of the alleged Black Panther terrorists were actually George W. Bush in disguise. Bushdidit! Hope and Change.

After reading the article several times, it seems we should add the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the ACLU, the NAACP, and President Obama's DoJ to the list of racist organizations in this country; they rank right up there with the KKK, Planned Parenthood, and New Black Panther Party.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.