The right to abandon your child


#1

This is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals by the lapels and demand, “Well, what did you expect?”

A group called the National Center for Men has filed a lawsuit they are calling “Roe v. Wade for Men.” Here are the facts: A 25-year-old computer programmer named Matt Dubay of Saginaw, Mich., was ordered by a judge to pay $500 per month in child support for a daughter he fathered with his ex-girlfriend. His contention – and that of the National Center for Men – is that this requirement is unconstitutional because it violates the equal protection clause.

Dubay does not dispute that he is the child’s father. Rather, he claims that during the course of his relationship with the mother, he was given to understand that she could not become pregnant because of a physical condition. He insists that she knew he did not want to have children with her. The courts, he and his advocates argue, are forcing parenthood upon him in a way that they cannot do to a woman.

Whole Article:
townhall.com/opinion/columns/monacharen/2006/03/10/189321.html


#2

[quote=jdnation]This is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals by the lapels and demand, “Well, what did you expect?”

A group called the National Center for Men has filed a lawsuit they are calling “Roe v. Wade for Men.” Here are the facts: A 25-year-old computer programmer named Matt Dubay of Saginaw, Mich., was ordered by a judge to pay $500 per month in child support for a daughter he fathered with his ex-girlfriend. His contention – and that of the National Center for Men – is that this requirement is unconstitutional because it violates the equal protection clause.

Dubay does not dispute that he is the child’s father. Rather, he claims that during the course of his relationship with the mother, he was given to understand that she could not become pregnant because of a physical condition. He insists that she knew he did not want to have children with her. The courts, he and his advocates argue, are forcing parenthood upon him in a way that they cannot do to a woman.

Whole Article:
townhall.com/opinion/columns/monacharen/2006/03/10/189321.html
[/quote]

This is a logical consequence of Roe vs Wade.

What a sick world we live in.


#3

There is already a well developed thread on this subject here: forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=102508

Walt


DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.