Tony Bobulinski reveals details of conversation with Joe Biden

Tony Bobulinski reveals details of conversation with Joe Biden

Oct. 28, 2020 - 17:06 - Ex-Hunter Biden business partner calls out family for accusing him of spreading disinformation on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’


Bobulinski: ‘I think Joe Biden and the Biden family are compromised’

Oct. 28, 2020 - 12:25 - Ex-Hunter Biden associate details deals with Chinese Communist Party-connected company on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’


Former Hunter Biden business associate speaks out on Burisma scandal

Oct. 27, 2020 - 0:38 - Tony Bobulinski tells ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ why he almost walked out of last week’s Trump-Biden debate


Ex-Hunter Biden business associate speaks out in exclusive interview

Oct. 28, 2020 - 16:42 - Tony Bobulinski describes meeting Joe Biden at Beverly Hilton hotel on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’


‘You’re Gonna Bury All Of Us’: Whistleblower Describes Brazen Biden-China Dealings In Explosive Interview With Tucker Carlson

Tue, 10/27/2020

Former Biden insider Tony Bobulinski - a registered Democrat who’s donated to Democrats - just gave a smoking gun interview to Fox News’ Tucker Carlson on Tuesday, where he described his dealings with the Biden family in their bid to do business with China.

Bobulinski says that “Joe Biden and his family is compromised,” after describing dealings that included purchasing a portion of a Russian state-owned energy company .

In May, 2017, Bobulinski agreed to spearhead a deal between the Bidens and a CCP-linked Chinese company - meeting with Hunter Biden and Rosemont Seneca partner Rob Walker “multiple times,” and meeting with former Vice President Joe Biden twice.

Text messages obtained . . . show Hunter Biden personally arranging a meeting with his business partners and Joe Biden to discuss a major deal with CEFC, a Chinese energy company. The meeting occurred at the Beverly Hilton in L.A. in early May. Texts are from May 2, 2017. . . .

. . . Bobulinski described a May 2nd meeting at the Los Angeles Beverly Hilton with Hunter and Jim Biden. A short while later, Joe Biden reportedly showed up to the meeting “because they were sort of, wining and dining me, and presenting the strength of the Biden family to get me more engaged” in their China deal with CEFC “both in the United States and around the world.”

Tony Bobulinski: "I didn’t request to meet Joe. They requested that I meet with Joe … They were putting their entire family legacy on the line. They knew exactly what they were doing. They were dealing with a Chinese-owned enterprise

. . . . Tony Bobulinski: I asked James Biden point blank at the Peninsula Hotel about how they were structuring all these deals and getting away with it without putting Joe Biden’s career at risk.

“James Biden said, ‘Plausible deniability,’” Bobulinski said. . . .

. . . A former Seal Team is protecting his family: . . .

. . . This is just like the Russian collusion story except with verified evidence and on-the-record sources.

— David Harsanyi (@davidharsanyi) October 28, 2020 . . . .

1 Like

These photos are the kinds of “compromising” things I am sure Bobulinski is talking about.
But admittedly it is tough to know details because the group of people (the MSM) who should be holding the Biden Clan accountable, is COVERING for this stuff right now.

That’s WHY you cannot go to the MSM and get such information. (You WILL be able to AFTER the election of course.)

It is kind of like the MSM is acting as, “an enemy of the people”.

By the way. This suggests to me, that if there is ANY “Russian Collusion” it would be with leftists.

And that also suggests (to me anyways) the national leftist howling the last 4 years was projection.

This will be a big story . . . AFTER the election.

The CAF readers, other people who are not MSM news snobs, and the conservatives around the nation will ALREADY KNOW this stuff then though.


BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Hunter Biden’s “RUSSIAN BLACKMAIL PHOTOS” Uncovered – Hunter with Russians in Hollywood

By Joe Hoft

Published October 27, 2020 at 8:00am

For years we heard the left claimed Russia was holding blackmail information on Donald Trump. The left even suggested that there was a Russian ‘pee – pee’ tape.

This was a complete lie. It was all made up.

But the Russians certainly are holding blackmail tapes on Hunter Biden to use against a Biden administration.

We found the real blackmail photos. This has nothing to do with President Trump. But it does have everything to do with THE BIDENS.

Hunter Biden was certainly an addict and may still be. He put himself in highly compromising situations as a result. He was high or wasted much of the time and therefore very narcissistic and reckless. This showed in the way Hunter treated women, his family, friends and drugs.

Hunter’s father Joe Biden used Hunter to put together deals around the world in a racketeering enterprise to increase the Biden family’s wealth. This occurred throughout Joe’s 47 years in politics. He’s now running for President.

But it seems the Biden family has a problem. They were involved in numerous shady activities around the world and they are susceptible to compromise. In addition, Hunter put his family in additional blackmail situations all by himself. Because of his addiction, Hunter found himself in shady places with shady people and as a result he put his family in additional security and legal compromising positions.

One such example was in October 2018 on Devlin Drive West Hollywood with some ‘friends’. Hunter spent a night in this luxurious property with a group of girls and guys. One member of the group was a girl by the name of Christina. She has a California driver’s license. She also spent some time with Hunter. . . .

1 Like

Were these the actions which Trump asked the Ukraine to investigate?

I don’t think so.

This is Biden “extra-Ukranian” corruption I think. But more will be coming out that’s for sure.

So the Democrats decided that Trump attempting to get the Ukraine to investigate H. Biden was such an outrageous thing to do that he should be impeached?

1 Like

Anything to get rid of Trump. Anything.
Anything to take back power. Anything.
And when they get back power, “everything is on the table”.



This just supports President Trump in those efforts.

Regarding Biden Ukraine, and corruption?
If the shoe fits (the Biden Clan), wear it.

1 Like

Depends on how you define bribery as is written in the Constitution, I guess. The majority of people not only wanted to impeach but remove Trump from office immediately, according to Fox News polls. If it hadn’t been for a Trump-steered Senate he inherited, Pence would be President today.

1 Like

Yep…Amazing,isnt it?

1 Like

What majority of people?This country is evenly divided,so maybe half the country,the ones who are uninformed and by the leftist biased media’s lies.

1 Like

The posted dates are wrong. It was put up today. Oct. 28th. Not Oct. 29th.

Other than that, the story seems fine.


Hunter Biden’s business partners feared release of China story

Oct. 29, 2020 - 4:46 - Tucker Carlson shares more from his exclusive interview with Tony Bobulinski on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’


Tucker: What’s Joe Biden’s excuse for slandering Tony Bobulinski?

Oct. 29, 2020 - 9:45 - ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ host accuses mainstream media of suppressing Hunter Biden scandal to influence election.


Bobulinski alleges Joe Biden was involved in Hunter’s foreign dealings

Oct. 29, 2020 - 3:40 - ‘Justice’ host Jeanine Pirro sounds off on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’


Come on, man !



Supporters of Donald Trump for the office of the United States President have demonstratively forfeited their right invoke personal character in the evaluation of a candidate’s worthiness to take office for this and ALL future elections, unless they of course are looking to be greeted with a chorus of cackles at the unconceivable attempt to evade or be ignorant of the conspicuous hypocrisy of their efforts.

Oh, and be sure to let us know when a neutral media source produces a legitimate report of reasonable merit.

1 Like

ForeverLearn . . .

Supporters of Donald Trump for the office of the United States President have demonstratively forfeited their right invoke personal character in the evaluation of a candidate’s worthiness . . .

No I haven’t.

I get to make those decisions for myself as a voter.
Someone else does not get to make these decisions for me.

But to the point, this thread is not about “Donald Trump”.

unless they of course are looking to be greeted with a chorus of cackles

People here get that criticizing Biden just on policy too.

Judging from posters posts here, I don’t think people are going to be too intimidated by that. At least I’m not.


Oh, and be sure to let us know when a neutral media source produces a legitimate report of reasonable merit.

Why speak on behalf if others here? (“let US know”. . )

There are no “neutral media source(s)”.

The “media” isn’t the person putting forth these backed-up statements. Bobulinski is.

And I thought the Democratic base forfeited their right to invoke personal character in the evaluation of a candidates worthiness to take office for this and all future elections when they elected FDR - a racist misogynist adulterer … No? if not FDR … perhaps JFK -an adulterer and misogynist or was it LBJ also an adulterer and misogynist or but then maybe it was Teddy Kennedy - an adulterer and misogynist and drunken driver who killed a young lady and left the scene of an accident … No???

Then was it Clinton who is also an adulterer and misogynist and assaulter of women …No … sure then after the election of Trump perhaps its Biden who is also a racist and pervert and assaulter of women …


It’s disingenuous to respond to part of the statement, when the context proceeding it is vitally important to the point being made. That said, of course you have the right to you decisions, but decisions have consequences. For many, in the court of public opinion, that consequence is a significant loss of credibility. The base vote will always be there for either side, but the base doesn’t win the election.

I was not alluding to anyone being intimidated, but rather showing that a future attempt to sway the opinion of a voter by using character against the nominee, while ignoring the more numerous and abhorrent character issues of the sitting President is going to present as hypocritical to most anyone with a functioning brain.

People are still trotting that dead horse out?

Personal testimony is one of the most unreliable sources of evidence.
Personal Testimony

Possibly, but those are long in the past, so they are very unlikely to have much effect on current elections.

Traditionally it has been the right (many times evangelicals) who have hung their hat on the character angle. Moderates will see through the weak veil of self-righteousness and get a clear look of the hypocrisy of supporting such a vile, abhorrent, dangerous human-being. The damage to the GPO could last for a decade or more.

Disclosure: I am Independent with a left lean

forfeited their right invoke personal character in the evaluation of a candidate’s worthiness to take office for this and ALL future elections,

You said ALL Future elections … but I guess that is a only for the Right … and not for the Left … which of course has no standards at all which is why Clinton spoke at this yeas DNC Convention … and Biden is current - right now running …

Lets see - Romney was a misogynist and racist … as was McCain … and Bush - both …

Trump is far less a racist than Biden who has illustrated - clearly - no need for re-interpretation or being informed about ‘dog whistles’ …

Truth is you do not know if Trump is a racist - but Herschel Walker who has known him for decades says he is not …

And I hear you - long past sins dont count for Dems but do for Trump - I get it …

At least he is not for aborting African American babies by the thousands and using tax payer dollars to do so as is Biden and Harris


You are of course correct, I did say ALL and that was an important blunder I would certainly take off the table, if allowed. But trust me, it will have lasting effects, especially for Independent and young, open-minded voters.

What I think I said, possibility incoherently, is that the Democratic voters have traditionally not pushed character as their calling card trait for their candidates (not saying it is not at all important) or to go after Republican candidates (until Trump) whereas the Republican party has gone after Clinton and some of the others you mentioned earlier for their character flaws in the past. I personally believe GOP voters had a better reputation even among Democrats (even though they probably wouldn’t admit it) for which they have risked for possibly only 4 years of Trump. Those 4 years did net 3 SCOTUS judges, but in a way which presented a bad look.

However, Donald Trump is almost universally characterized as a narcistic, misogynistic demagogue, with the propensity for pathological lying that dramatically surpassed anyone who has even been in the Office. The majority of his supporters do not even deny this. This article also shows very strong evidence of his bigotry and racism:

Trump Bigotry

If you are attempting to equate the character misgivings of past Presidents with Donald J Trump, there is no sense for us to continue the banter, as strong strong in my disagreement of that claim.

In my opinion, he has set the US back possibly decades in foreign relations.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit