Trump campaign sues CNN for libel over opinion article

The Trump campaign announced Friday that it sued CNN for libel over an opinion article, saying it wants the network to be held “accountable for intentionally publishing false statements against” it.

The big picture: It’s the latest of a series of libel suits by the campaign aimed at media outlets’ opinion articles on issues linked to Russia. Over the last few weeks, the campaign has also sued the New York Times and the Washington Post, alleging similar motives.

  • While President Trump has often threatened to sue news organizations for libel, he has rarely followed through.
  • The efforts face a relatively high bar for proof compared to most lawsuits. In order for a public official to successfully sue for libel, they must be able to prove that the defendant acted with “actual malice.”

The article named in the suit, written by CNN contributor Larry Noble and published in June, states that “the Trump campaign assessed the potential risks and benefits of again seeking Russia’s help in 2020 and has decided to leave that option on the table.”

  • That assertion is backed up earlier in the piece by citing a Trump interview last year with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos, where Trump said he’d “want to hear” information offered on political opponents by a foreign government. His statement in that interview was also used to support an argument in one of the Post pieces that resulted in a lawsuit.
  • The CNN piece also cites an “Axios on HBO” interview with White House adviser Jared Kushner, who said that he doesn’t know whether he’d call the FBI if he were to receive another email like the one before the campaign’s Trump Tower meeting, which had the subject line: “Re: Russia - Clinton - private and confidential.”


More at above link

Is there a problem?

What a waste of money…Another reason not to donate to political campaigns.

I think a problem here is that it appears to be a S.L.A.P. lawsuit. I don’t expect it to actually result in any ruling against CNN. As a public figure the bar is set higher for passing the test for libel. Rather, with law suites like this the law suite itself it a tool for giving someone grief even if it isn’t thought that there’s a chance of winning.

1 Like

That’s where CNN went wrong. Relying on what Trump said in an interview. Trump intends to break new legal ground. Relying on his words is actionable and tortious. Lol

1 Like

Oscar Wilde was ultimately taken down after he sued the Marquess of Queensberry for libel over the former’s accusations that Wilde was in a homosexual relationship with his son. The moral of the story; don’t sue for libel when the accusations against you are true. A civil trial doesn’t work like a criminal trial, but what it does mean is that the defendants can enter things into evidence that trump might prefer not to be read in open court.

I’m predicting the lawsuits get dropped fairly quickly when the news outlets don’t back down.


This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit