If he gave an address to biggest Pro-Life event that no other POTUS did in 45 years , that allegation holds no water.- this logic fails, one can give an address and can be the first POTUS in 45 years to do so and still not be invested.
e.g Hillary seemed to be friends with Mother Teresa’s. Does this mean that she is firmly invested in caring for poor like Mother Teresa did? How many FLOTUS were friends with Mother Teresa - a champion of poor?
Something which POTUS is really invested is building a wall and he says it will prevent shedding of American blood and thus enforced a shutdown but every day 900+ babies are killed by PP and his govt is still funding them 500m?
Actions speak louder than words
Being better than the past POTUSes does not mean he is invested in PRO-LIFE