There isn’t enough information to know whether Trump really opposes settlements or not.
This language from the article is pretty non-committal.
“While we don’t believe the existence of settlements is an impediment to peace, the construction of new settlements or the expansion of existing settlements beyond their current borders may not be helpful in achieving that goal … The Trump administration has not taken an official position on settlement activity and looks forward to continuing discussions, including with Prime Minister Netanyahu when he visits with President Trump later this month.”
But if he does, I, for one, do not agree with him. I very much disagree with an “Arabs only” state in the West Bank. And if the West Bank is not to be “Arabs only”, then the Jews have to live somewhere. While I could be wrong about this, it is my impression that the good land in the West Bank is already pretty clearly owned, either by Arabs or Jews. Most of these settlements seem to be out in the desert, where few people of any kind live, and where claims to ownership are pretty shaky.
It is my impression that Jews in the West Bank live in very compact settlements, much smaller than a town of similar population would be in the U.S. It is my further impression they’re that way for safety. Jews cannot safely live in separate habitations out in the desert.
Interesting how things are. I recently read an article about a Canadian company that laboriously acquired title to a sizeable parcel of land in the West Bank, subdivided it, established an ownership record system, and is selling the tracts to Arabs. Nobody complains about that, to my knowledge.