Tucker: It's time to see the evidence

Don’t hold your breath, Tucker.

1 Like

Good for him.

2 Likes

See the problem with this of course is that now the whip is being applied equally across their own back those who were touting Carlson will likely find it less profitable to do so or say he is a ‘traitor’ and so forth.

1 Like

Anyone else a bit fed up with journalists behaving as if they are state officials?

It is not for journalists to:

  • decide who has won an election
  • decide who has won a court case
1 Like

The evidence could be staring some of them in the face and actually touching their nose and they would deny it. Let the law do what the law is meant to do. Not journalist to decide anything.

1 Like

On the whole the journalists seem to be reporting what the state officials and the courts say. It is the President and his lawyers, backed by a load of unofficial voices shouting on Twitter, who seem to have an alternative view.

2 Likes

And that’s exactly what’s been happening. Lawsuits are being tossed out for lack of evidence

2 Likes

Well the shine seems to have gone of that Tucker boy ‘reet quick like’ it would seem.

1 Like

The evidence doesn’t have to be presented yet. It just needs to appear in the proper venues. Which is not media and talk shows.

Al Gore had 37 days.

It certainly does.

Apparently the courts disagree with you.

1 Like

Why do you insist on removing the context from what I said?
Nice job with partial quoting.

Or did I need to specify that the proper venues are courtooms? They’re not done with that part as you should know.

Can’t imagine how you think I wasn’t referring to courtrooms when I said “the courts.” I don’t believe I mentioned tennis or basketball.

1 Like

This will likely make it’s way to the Supreme Court. Unless Trump has a change of heart and concedes, which doesn’t seem likely. I say, let the courts decide. At this point, a new election ought to be called and install protections to prevent voter fraud. Whether there is widespread voter fraud or not has yet to be proven, but we should all be concerned about Biden picking up 100k votes overnight in a single dump or computer error. Or during recounts finding several batches of 2-3k votes for Trump that were somehow “lost” or “overlooked”. This obviously shows malfeasance to some degree. The whole thing needs overhauling.

2 Likes

Back at you.

Can’t imagine how you think I wasn’t saying evidence never has to be presented?

Again, thanks for the quote taken out of context.

I don’t think he’s trying to decide who won, but if millions of votes were changed from Trump to Biden (as Sidney Powell claims), that would be the single greatest crime in American history. Democracy totally destroyed. And if she has evidence of that, it only makes sense for her to spread it everywhere she could, “shouting it from the rooftops”. Instead she is apparently keeping all the evidence to herself, which doesn’t seem to make logical sense.

1 Like

Where are all the investigative journalists? No curiosity about the hundreds of affidavits, a history of election fraud in big cities, votes possibly counted in other countries, possibly defective software, vote watchers being intimated and bullied and not allowed to monitor the vote?

I’m not sure why Sidney Powell refused to go on Tucker’s show. She appeared on other shows. She’s been on Lou Dobb’s show several times. Maybe she feared Tucker would ask tough questions challenging her.

Yeah and they asked her so many times she got mad and said stop calling me. I can’t imagine why she would withhold all that wonderful evidence .

1 Like

Thanks for claiming I said something I didn’t say.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.