Ok, playing scientist here, I know for a fact that an organism requires somthing to consume in order to survive. Some require only sunlight, but akll require moisture, there is no moisture in a fossle, how and why would some organism opt to imbedd itself within something that has nothing inherent to support life of any kind?
Guys, this is not the first time this has happened discovery wise, I now see how these get covered up, only this time, it’s not going to be so neat, for it has gained too much exposure already and the scientist that made the discovery is not a creationist to boot.
If you want to ignore the physical evidence in regards to the red blood cells, of which were proven to be just that with their initial trials using rat’s, of which I’m not going to get into nitty gritty details wise, at least know that the part that was tested was not fossilized, it was bone itself. How can bone itself survive 65-70 million years?
This discovery breaks down the very core of how we understand fossilization, we are in error in regards to that one alone. This discovery also breaks down the very core of how current science is handling these discoveries, luckily we are headed towards being able to clone animals, and in this case, eventually they will be able to use the left over matter to create a t-rex itself. It’s only a matter of time folks, we are already very close to this level of sophistication.
I do find it interesting that no research was given as to how it could have survived this long, this would be the approach taken for those that want to debunk this discovery, yet they missed the opportunity and gave us the lame excuse that it was from the 60’s, even though it was clear from the beginning that carbon dating was not going to be any good, that is why they did the rat testing initially.
Bottom line, the evidence for creation and a young earth is piling up, how much needs to be on the table before people realize that the bible was right and that our modern understandings of which contradict it is wrong? When do we get objective researchers in the mainstream scientific community? Why on earth do we stand by and let others with a clear aganda not to rock the boat regardless of the evidence, find ways of wording things to go in line with the current trends?
I used to believe in evolution, believe me, I am a very hard sale in regards to my core beliefs, I am I’m highly skeptical, seeing this and other evidence only reinforces what I have determined as being fact, that the bible clearly illustrates history in regards to the dinasaurs. Read Job sometime guys, it was written to end these kind of debates, nothing in the bible is there out of chance, or out of literary fluff, every single word has a clear purpose and it is to educate us.