US Elections: Why Social Issues Matter

Friday June 4, 2010

US Elections: Why Social Issues Matter
Chichester believes that present fiscal crisis is direct result of left’s war on life and family

Commentary By Dr. Brian Kopp

AUSTERLITZ, New York, June 4, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The upcoming November US elections are being held under the shadow of unprecedented global economic turmoil. As the chaos striking European nations deepens and threatens to spread, American conservatives are concerned that the politicians they support comprehend the origins and implications of this economic crisis and are willing to combat it effectively.

Tim Chichester, a candidate in the GOP primary for the US Senate seat occupied by Democrat appointee Kirsten Gillibrand, is working with the New York state Tea Party movement to educate voters on the true origins of the present crisis. An unapologetically pro-life veteran of the culture wars, Chichester believes that the present fiscal crisis is a direct result of the left’s war on life and the family.

Chichester says, “Frederick Engels focused on social issues as the key to transforming society to the socialist model; he firmly held that religion, traditional marriage and family structure must be destroyed so as to bring about social conditions that would usher in socialism.”

According to Chichester, “These economic dislocations and disasters are the exploding assets of Western civilization. They are the by-products of social assaults, collateral damage in socialism’s unrelenting war on the family. Every major economic ill we have can be directly traced to social policies. The promotion of divorce, promiscuity, abortion, pornography are all heavy artillery shells aimed at creating disconnected, disaffected and malleable individuals with no moral anchor or foundation.”

“All of these policies”, continues Chichester, "have enormous economic side effects as the individuals are severed from normal and natural social connections. Those policies that attack the family produce declining populations.

The American economic effects of abortion alone are estimated at over $50 trillion of lost GDP. Adam Smith noted that prosperity was associated with growing populations and poverty with declining populations. We must reverse these trends if we are to survive as a republic."

And Chichester sees a philosophical war emerging as a result. “What I see at stake in these elections goes far beyond balancing of the federal budget, desirable as it is. What is at stake is whether or not we will still have our republican form of government by the time these troubles pass - whether or not our children will grow up truly free. I see this as a last stand against what is coming. I do not expect to go down to Washington and come away unscathed, or have a long comfortable career. I expect to go to the Alamo, to fight to retain the Constitution during what is to be the Second Civil War: A war against the idea that man has unalienable rights. A war between Socialists who see man as property of the state and those who see property as inextricably bound to individual liberty and creativity. A war between the violent sterility of Socialism and the creative prosperity of a Godly people protected by a Divinely inspired Constitution.”

Chichester believes that those claiming that the current recession is almost over, with economic recovery on the near horizon, are delusional. He likens the current market indicators to the receding waters preceding an economic tsunami. “As a Catholic, I understand the moral implications of abortion, population control, etc. I understand in greater detail the economic and social penalty to be paid in adhering to behavior that is inherently evil. When a society adheres to a great evil, the impact is obvious. Our world is ready to see the enormous economic and social penalty that has accrued over the years because of our disregard for the life ethic.”

A vocal minority of Tea Party conservatives, primarily among the small libertarian faction, is insisting that social conservative issues be set aside in this election cycle to focus solely on “fiscal conservatism.” The fiscally conservative Libertarian Party is even threatening to run a candidate in the Kentucky Senate race against one of their own, Rand Paul, because of his support for a federal abortion ban and his opposition to gay marriage.

In this election, Chichester is urging social conservatives not to be deceived by “fiscal conservatives” seeking to forge a larger coalition based on marginalizing social issues, because this war is one which fiscal conservatism alone simply cannot win.

See Tim Chichester For US Senate website and Tim Chichester For U.S. Senate’s Facebook site

Dr. Brian Kopp has written articles for L’Osservatore Romano, The Wanderer, New Oxford Review and World Net Daily.

If you think fiscal conservatism isn't important, consider this:

"Give me control of a nation's money supply, and I care not who make its laws."
----- Mayer Rothschild

It is important. It just isn't as important as morality.

Social conservatives cannot permit "fiscal conservatives" to dictate to the conservative coalition that social conservative issues be marginalized in order to forge a broader consensus, because that consensus will be wholly unable to defeat the forces of the left based on fiscal conservatism alone.

Social conservatives must speak out and direct the agenda of the Tea Party movement, and refuse to let the fiscal conservatives dictate the agenda (just as the mainstream GOP has ignored the social conservative base.)

The social and moral battle is ALL that matters to me anymore. I'm not that interested in the economy, or the border, or health care, or capitalism or socialism or the credit crunch, or tax breaks for the rich, etc. Those issues are important in the little picture of running a country, for sure. But if we can't end this horrid chain of social engineering that is detroying the heart and soul of the American people, the American family, our morals, our ethics, our motives, etc. If we can't win this war, the the rest of the "issues" are folly anyway. Unchecked modern, (not classical), liberalism leads to death and imprisonment for those who love God.

We have only two things we were asked to do. Neither of them can be done by the Government, and we can't seem to do them.

  1. Love the Lord our God with all our heart, soul and mind.

  2. Love our neighbor as ourselves.

(our neigbor is everyone)

If more people do these, then don't, then we've got it licked!

Peace,

Steven

[quote="universalindult, post:3, topic:200823"]
It is important. It just isn't as important as morality.

Social conservatives cannot permit "fiscal conservatives" to dictate to the conservative coalition that social conservative issues be marginalized in order to forge a broader consensus, because that consensus will be wholly unable to defeat the forces of the left based on fiscal conservatism alone.

Social conservatives must speak out and direct the agenda of the Tea Party movement, and refuse to let the fiscal conservatives dictate the agenda (just as the mainstream GOP has ignored the social conservative base.)

[/quote]

Here is a platitude: he who has the gold makes the rules; the fiscal conservatives (country club Republicans who read The Wall Street Journal) fund the Republican Party. I doubt the fiscal conservatives really want to abolish abortion because as long as it discriminates against the birth of babies born to problematic demographic circumstances such as poverty or out of wedlock, then it would be a perceived as beneficial since it reduces the costs to society (defrayed by the taxpayer) in the future.

But what are the goals of social conservatives? To govern the nation with virtue while limiting the amoral Machiavellian calculations of secular power politics? Then one would need to reform or revolutionize the political system since the structure of the government encourages amoral power politics without any regard to virtue as an end (although feigning virtue may lead to the rewards of political power.)

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.