US to accept Hezbollah role

The administration has apparently concluded that the vacuum resulting from Syria’s withdrawal leaves it no option but to accept Hezbollah as a legitimate player in Lebanese politics.

U.S. Called Ready to See Hezbollah in Lebanon Role
New York Times
Published: March 10, 2005

“Hezbollah has American blood on its hands,” an administration official said, referring to such events as the truck bombing that killed more than 200 American marines in Beirut in 1983. “They are in the same category as Al Qaeda. The administration has an absolute aversion to admitting that Hezbollah has a role to play in Lebanon, but that is the path we’re going down.”

Only a few weeks ago, the United States was tangling with France over Hezbollah’s status, as France blocked an effort by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to have Europe formally label Hezbollah a terrorist group, restricting its fund-raising.

Now the United States has basically accepted the French view, echoed by others in Europe, that with Hezbollah emerging as such a force in very fractured Lebanon, it is dangerous to antagonize it right now and wiser to encourage the party to run candidates in Lebanese elections…

Although the US’s intervention in Iraq and support for democracy are catelists in what is happening in Lebanon, France is the major foreign power player there. It will be French troops, not ours in the country if foreign troops need to go in. So playing the game their way right now seems prudent.

Hezbollah may or may not survive all this (i.e., Lebanon democracy, Syrian isolation and Palestinian peace). Only time will tell.

More info:

US will accept disarmed Hizbollah

THE Bush administration would accept a political role for the Lebanese group Hizbollah if it disarmed, US officials said today, a stance they said was not new but reflected recognition of the political clout of the militant Shiite Muslim organisation.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice carefully avoided the stock US phrase that Hizbollah is a terrorist organisation in remarks to reporters, two days after Hizbollah showed its political power by drawing hundreds of thousands of people to central Beirut for a pro-Syria rally.
But she insisted that “the American view of Hizbollah has not changed” and other US officials were quick to call the group a terrorist organisation.

Ms Rice said US policy was focused on getting Syria to pull its 14,000 troops and its intelligence personnel from Lebanon so the country can have parliamentary elections in May without outside interference.

“We’re going to do one thing at a time. Lebanon is a very complex place with a lot of complex political factors but those cannot begin to come into harmony until you have Syrian forces out and we see what the real balance of forces and the real balance of interests in Lebanon look like,” she said.

Hizbollah is funded and armed by Iran and receives support from Syria. It began as an anti-Israel militia but is now also a political party with deputies in the Lebanese parliament and a network of charities.

“Obviously we’d like to see them disarmed as UN Security Council Resolution 1559 requires. Once disarmed they could undertake any political role in Lebanon that they can win democratically at the polls. This doesn’t constitute any change in the US position,” a senior Bush administration official said.

A State Department official, who asked not to be identified, said there was a recognition among US officials of Hizbollah’s political power but denied any policy change.

“We do have to live in the real world and unfortunately in that world people we really don’t like do sometimes get into elected office. Hizbollah - just like Hamas in the Palestinian territories - is a political force. But just because we recognise - as we always have - that reality does not mean we have changed our policy toward them,” the official said.

US officials denied a New York Times report that the administration had made a sharp policy shift and was grudgingly going along with efforts by France and the United Nations to steer the party into the Lebanese political mainstream.

“The report suggests that our view has changed on Hizbollah. It has not,” said White House spokesman Scott McClellan.

Hizbollah is on the State Department’s list of terrorist organisations and has been singled out by President George W. Bush and others as one of the biggest obstacles to peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians by sponsoring attacks against Israel.

The Times report drew criticism from a number of lawmakers reminded of the Hizbollah role in the 1983 Beirut bombing in which more than 200 US Marines were killed.

“The plain truth is that Hizbollah is an armed terrorist militia, responsible for hundreds of murders, including many Americans,” said Jane Harman, ranking Democrat of the House of Representatives intelligence committee. Mr Bush told EU leaders last month it was not in the best interest of the United States or Europe for Iran to fund “terrorist organisations like Hizbollah, which has the desire to stop the Middle East peace process from going forward”.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit