There’s problematic things like “is Jesus a descendant of David? No he is not”. There’s also “fake photographs of the earth from ‘space’”. Some lazy research, like saying the suppressed interview was due to “the occupiers of the Vatican” (as opposed to the USCCB, who actually suppressed it). And by saying there’s “Satanic Elements in the Novus Ordo Mass”, you’re saying that essentially the Ordinary Form is invalid. Which it isn’t, unless it was promulgated by someone without authority. Which means at that point, sedevacantistism.
Those in themselves is enough to throw out the content of the website. But there’s something else, two specific things she said I wanted to highlight though. You have to do a bit of digging to find them, but I did.
From Suzanne Broussard herself: "the fact that under Bolshevism 60 million Christian white people were systematically murdered by Jewish Communists simply becomes a politically incorrect statement, to be replaced by the non-fact, though politically correct myth, of the Jewish Holocaust.
From Suzanne Broussard herself: “The following is an article published in Look Magazine in 1966, if you can stomach it. It is an extremely detailed account of how a bunch of Jewish street-thugs, dressed up as Cardinals, Bishops and Popes, took control of the Vatican by using the myth of the Jewish ‘holocaust’ as a basis, along with a lot of sneakiness”.
The historical evidence for the Shoah is real. From a journalism perspective, there’s corroboration. From a documentation perspective, loads of it. We have eyewitness accounts, secondary witness accounts, survivors, people who worked at the camps, martyrs like Kolbe. There’s unbiased historical information which, again, has been corroborated and verified through the means which historians use to validate the accuracy of the information.
The Holocaust is a living memory, and is validated both by historical process, journalistic practices, witness accounts, and more. Suzanne may not question the genocides against the Jews in the Old Testament, but in the face of overwhelming evidence she calls the systematic extermination of the Jews in World War II a “myth”?
It’s intellectually dishonest, intellectually ignorant. And very much devalues the lives of those who died in the Shoah, and the sacrifices of those who tried to save them.
So no, the website isn’t credible at all. And frankly, if you agree with Suzanne Broussard regarding the “myth of the Holcaust”, you stand against history and the Catholic Church. And by associating Bishop Lefebvre with her as you did, you diminish him a great deal.
So I must ask, since you posted her site, do you agree with Suzanne Broussard’s stance onthe “satanic novus ordo”? About “fake pictures from space”?
And do you agree with her that the Holocaust was “a myth”?
I ask that Venerable Pope Pius XII and Saint Maximilian Kolbe intercede for Suzanne Broussard, and those who subscribe to her thoughts.