Vatican Rejects UN Committee’s Call for Changes to Canon Law

ncregister.com/daily-news/vatican-rejects-un-committees-call-for-changes-to-canon-law/

Vatican Rejects UN Committee’s Call for Changes to Canon Law

The Holy See has released a detailed response to criticisms made earlier this year by the Committee on the Rights of the Child.

BY ANDREA GALIARDUCCI/CNA/EWTN NEWS 09/30/2014

VATICAN CITY — The Holy See has rejected the United Nations’ Committee on the Rights of the Child’s call for changes to canon law, and has formally criticized the group for a “grave misunderstanding” of the Holy See’s sovereignty.

In a response released Sept. 26, the Holy See delivered its comments on the Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of Child.

In January, the committee had discussed the written report on the Convention on the Rights of the Child submitted by the Holy See as one of the states that had signed the convention.

After a hearing held Jan. 16, the U.N. committee issued a report to which the Holy See responded in its Sept. 26 statement. The Holy See maintained that its treaty obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child apply to Vatican City State, and that these obligations do not touch on its relation with dioceses and religious orders throughout the world.

“The Holy See, in accordance with the rules of international law, is aware that attempting to implement the CRC in the territory of other states could constitute a violation of the principle of noninterference in the internal affairs of States,” the response read.

The response also underscored that “the Holy See does not ratify a treaty on behalf of every Catholic in the world, and therefore, does not have obligations to implement the convention within the territories of other states parties on behalf of Catholics.”

The Holy See also criticized the fact that “the treaty body has plunged into canon law, which is a juridical system, however, not equivalent to that of States.”
The committee’s observations were published Feb. 7, and seemed meant to pressure the Church to change its teaching on human sexuality.

For instance, the committee wrote with “regret that the Holy See continues to place emphasis on the promotion of complementarity and equality in dignity” of men and women; asked “the Holy See to review its position on abortion … identifying circumstances under which access to abortion services can be permitted;” urged the Holy See to “remove gender stereotypes from Catholic school textbooks … which may limit the development of the talents and abilities of boys and girls and undermine their educational and life opportunities.”

The committee also expressed “concern about the Holy See’s past statements and declarations on homosexuality which contribute to the social stigmatization of and violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender adolescents and children raised by same sex couples.”

‘Lack of Respect for the Text of a Treaty’

The Holy See said that all of these criticisms are beyond the text of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and noted that it is “concerned about a lack of respect for the text of a treaty, which has been carefully drafted by States Parties, including the Holy See itself.”

According to the Holy See, the committee has put into action “a clear and open violation” of the ordinary meaning of the terms of the convention when the concluding observations “advocate for abortion.”

The response also addressed the committee’s promotion of “diverse forms of family” as a matter of principle, while “this expression is not found in the Convention nor it is defined.”

Nor is the word “gender” contained in the text of the convention, and it is “apparently employed to incorporate a larger ideological platform,” the Holy See noted.

The Holy See finally underscored that many of the recommendations “may also be viewed through the prism of religious freedom, in particular regard to the autonomy of religious communities to express their doctrine, manifest their faith and worship.”

The response delivered Sept. 26 insisted that the understanding and documentation provided by the Holy See had been assessed with bias by the committee, and that the “concluding observations include inaccurate statements that have no evidentiary foundation,” while “many materials presented by the Holy See, especially regarding child protection, were dismissed and ignored.”

So, essentially they asked the See, “Could y’all just get with the times and give up your morals?”.

This oughta be a good discussion :popcorn:

I agree!!:popcorn:

Thanks.:slight_smile: Pax.

Who do these people think they are?

Never in the history of the world has there been a more worthless and toothless organization than the United Nations. The only times the UN has EVER accomplished anything of note has been when the United States has backed it up militarily. Since it’s inception, the UN has been nothing but a waste of time and money.

If I were pope, I would either ignore the UN’s call for “change”, or say something to the effect of “Seriously? You guys really need to stop sniffing glue.” I am glad that His Holiness is far more diplomatic than I. :slight_smile:

In the words of Captain Kirk: “Forget it”.

In one way, UN is an anti democratic organisation of democratic states. I think asking for changes in canon law and changes to all dioceses is just too much.

The world has put the Church on trial. And I believe that this corresponds to the trial phase of Jesus’ Passion.
The Church will enter the glory of the kingdom only through this final Passover, when she will follow her Lord in his death and Resurrection. The kingdom will be fulfilled, then, not by a historic triumph of the Church through a progressive ascendancy, but only by God’s victory over the final unleashing of evil, which will cause his Bride to come down from heaven. God’s triumph over the revolt of evil will take the form of the Last Judgment after the final cosmic upheaval of this passing world.” - CCC, 677

Great response from the Vatican:thumbsup: As far as the UN they are worth nothing.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.