In it, he states: “If anyone shall say that real and natural water is not necessary for baptism, and on that account those words of Our Lord Jesus Christ: ‘Unless a man be born again of the water and the Holy Spirit’[John 3:5] are distorted into some sort of metaphor: let him be anathema.”
This is a complete denial of Baptism of Desire, despite the fact that Baptism of Desire is a Church Dogma. This is a canon of a Church council too, so I don’t think it was just a mistake or material heresy he had. So I’m having trouble reconciling these words with Baptism of Desire. It appears to be a clear contradiction. Any light that could be shed on this would be appreciated.