What does 1 John 3:6 Mean?


#1

usccb.org/bible/1john/3

What does this mean? Isn’t this kind of very … black and white?

So whenever I sin, I completely not-know Christ at all? That doesn’t seem right. How do I know to pray after committing a sin for forgiveness?

And if I know Christ, then that means I will never sin? That doesn’t seem right either, because I think I know … at least a little about Him, but I still do sin.

Thanks.
n


#2

I understand it this way:

A person can’t act badly, and at the same time be a true disciple of Jesus.Those who abide in Christ do not continue in the practice of sin. Renouncing sin is part of seeking spiritual union with Him. His followers believe in His rejection of sinful ways.

The human condition is flawed. Never-the-less, we seek to improve by doing right and avoiding wrong. Jesus is the great light for us to follow, and stay on course.


#3

Here is the notes from the original Douay Rheims Bible of 1609
6. Sins not. Jovinian and Pelagius falsely (as heretics used to do) argued upon these words and those that follow verse 9; the one, that the baptized could sin no more: the other, that no man being or remaining just, could sin. But among many good senses given of this place, this seems most agreeable, that the apostle should say, that mortal sin does not consist together with the grace of God, and therefore cannot be committed by a man continuing the son of God. And so is the like speech in the ninth verse following to be taken. See St. Jerome (li. 2. cont. Jovinia num, c. 1)

Cornelius a Lapide says this
**Ver. 9.—**And he cannot sin, because he is born of God. Hence Jovinian, Luther, and Calvin taught that a man could not fall away, but was sure of his salvation. But S. John says, “My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not.” Consequently they could sin, faithful though they were. And it is contrary to daily experience, for we find daily the faithful becoming heretics and falling into sin. And the Council of Trent (vi. 23) rules otherwise. What then is S. John’s meaning that he who is born of God cannot sin, that is mortally and gravely? 1. We must take the word collectively—and then it will mean, So long as he preserves the seed of grace, he cannot sin. So Œcumenius, Thomas Anglicus, Cajetan, and S. Hierom, lib. 11 extra Jovin. And accordingly theologians say that he who has effectual grace cannot sin, because effectual grace in its very conception includes its result. For that grace is called ‘effectual’ which (as is foreseen) will produce its effect, which is to lead our free will to co-operate in a good work. But, speaking abstractedly, he who has effectual grace can resist it, and commit sin. (See Conc. Trid. sess. vi. can. 4.)

  1. He who is born of God cannot (in a formal sense) commit sin, that is as far as relates to his heavenly new birth. For if this be allowed to act, and is not withstood by our free will, it is fully able to keep out all sin. (See S. Augustine, de grat. Christi, cap. xxi.) Thus Adam is said in his state of innocence to have been immortal, because he could not die, as long as he remained therein. But as he could fall, so also could he die. Thus we say that this medicine, e.g., is so powerful that any one who takes it could not die of the plague. But a man refuses to take the medicine and then dies; so can he who has the grace of God refuse to use it, and thus fall into sin. S. John here distinguishes between the supernatural action of Divine grace, and the exercise of moral virtues, the first of these preventing every sin, while the others do not. But the habit of temperance is not lost by one act of intemperance, even as temperance is not acquired by a single act of temperance. Again, the grace of Christ is distinguished from the grace given to Adam, which gave the power but not the will, whereas the grace of Christ gives both the will and the power. See S. Augustine (de corrupt. et gratia), “It is so provided (to meet the weakness of the human will), that Divine grace never fails, is never overpowered by any difficulty, so as ever to resolutely will that which is good, and obstinately refuse to abandon it.” And it is thus that he explains the words of S. John, “Every one that is born of God sinneth not.”

  2. He cannot sin. He sins with difficulty. He has no wish to sin, says Œcumenius. Others explain the words, He has power not to sin, this power being given him by God.

  3. Rightfully and properly he cannot sin, though he may in fact sin against all that is right and proper.

  4. Gagneius says, “He cannot sin, i.e., by unbelief, which S. John calls a sin unto death.”

  5. Some take these words as referring to those who are predestinated and absolutely elected to eternal life. But this must be understood, not of antecedent, but consequent impossibility, which consists with our liberty of will, as including and presupposing it.

The first and second of these explanations seem to be the best.


#4

We are all sinners in need of conversion, this is absolutely true, even St. Paul recognized as much.

Now it is also true that we CAN overcome some of our sins through GRACE, if we are willing to work at it.
As an example I used to have a particular recurrent sin that I needed to confess over and over. Until my priest told me that I had to do something, something that would break this circle of sin. He recommended to ask our mother in Heaven.
Which I did, I started to have a more committed pray life and asked her to intercede for me and rid me of this sin.
And she did. Am I sinless now! I wish but it is a start.
And I recognized that every time I committed that sin I had broken Jesus relationship with me.
Thank GOD for the Sacrament of penance and for that priest that hit me with a 2x4 to knock some sense into me.



#5

Thanks. It kind of sounds to me like, “Do or do not. There is no try.”


#6

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.