I find that page an interesting example of what I call propaganda.
Notice that there is no references to prove their case?
It’s all rhetoric that they expect you to believe simply because they say it is all so.
I love this one…
The Vatican hates true, New Testament, militant Baptist Churches for the following reasons:
Can anyone provide a single statement from the Vatican that will prove this to be true?
Of course not! Why? Because it’s a false statement. They cannot cite any proof texts because such do not exist.
Here’s another one
.When the Jesuits are conspiring with the Communists in South America they are called Christian missionaries–but when one is killed by a terrorist, The Gannett News Syndicate proclaims “Roman Catholic Priest Martyred.”
See any citations that prove this ever happened? Why do you suppose that is? (Hint:See the underlined sentence above…)
Baptists claim apostolic origin with One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism. History reveals that the Roman Catholic Church evolved as a split off of the true New Testament Church when Cornelius won worldly favor over Novation in the second century. By the third century, the worldly counterfeit Church was wed to the world by Emperor Constantine.
That’s funny… not all Baptists claim that. In fact, a great many honest Baptists do exactly what we are doing right now. They shake their heads and wonder where in the world someone came up with this. (Looks like “Trail of Blood” based propaganda to me.)
This will be my last citation…(The rest is just more hooey)
Because of our Bible:
Constantine ordered Eusebius to destroy hundreds of copies of the Byzantine Manuscripts and replace them with a new corrupt copy. Origins Hexapla and other perversions were being substituted for the Majority Text. What followed? the Dark Ages 480-1400 AD! Very little light (except within true churches) was seen due to Jeromes Latin Vulgate, Jesuit Bibles and the Rheim Text. Baptists were custodians of the True Text: Waldensian Bibles, Old Latin Vulgates, Syriac copies, Erasmus’ Text, then Wycliffe’s and Tyndale’s Bible. These Bibles and Greek Texts were burned by the thousands by the Harlot Church. Then came the King James Version which was later condemned and hated by the Vatican. Illiteracy and Ignorance are Rome’s favorite tools.Any historical proofs of these allegations? Do I need to point out again exactly why?
That last statement is indicative of just how messed up this propaganda is.
Check your history. Who was it that founded the schools and universities all over the world prior to the barbarian invasions that brought on the “Dark Ages”? And then after they were destroyed and Western Civilization was all but collapsed, who was it that came over from Ireland and re-evangelized Europe, bringing with them the Word of God as well as scientific and classical literature as well? Sure as vitam aeternam wasn’t the Ana-Baptists.
BTW…Ana-Baptists are called that because they preach rebaptism. Where is that in the New Testament? I know of only one case, and that was when they had only received John’s baptism.:dts:
Oh, and the 1611 KJV Bible they are so big on…
That’s not the one that they use. I have held in my hand an actual 1611 Edition KJV Bible and guess what? It had 73 books in it! I can’t tell you how many times I have pointed that out to KJV onlyists, and none have offered a good answer. Why? because it’s true and they don’t want to talk about the fact that it had all the books in it up until the mid 1800s when some Bible society decided to cut corners and take them out.:shrug: